Recently the Decatur Park District voted to close the Nelson Park Golf Course – Decatur’s oldest golf course. Budget issues, lack of player interest, and maintenance issues were the reasons given for the closure. However, it’s no secret that community leaders have been eying Nelson Park for a while for possible commercial and residential development. Many residents are worried that their input will fall on deaf ears; they have good reason to feel that way.
Thousands protested the closure of Stephen Decatur High School; it closed anyway. Hundreds of residents, on the north end of town, protested the Target development, which required the demolition of Mound Middle School and Sunnyside School; the schools were torn down and replaced with a department store and other retail establishments. Many were opposed to the expensive West Main improvements; they happened anyway. Granted, it’s hard to find 100% agreement amongst voters, but when it’s obvious the vast majority of Decatur’s residents oppose a particular action by either our city council or park district, our elected officials should stop and listen. They may learn something. That’s what representative government is all about. Yes, there’s times when our elected officials have to approve unpopular things – like tax hikes, initiatives related to public safety, etc.; however, if the Letters to the Editor, in the Herald & Review, are any indication, few if any residents supported the total closure of the Nelson Park golf course. Just as many are worried about possible development that will consume the entire park.
The Park District has stated the land will remain mowed and accessible to the public. My question: how is this going to save money for the Park District (us taxpayers) ? The costs to mow so much land has to be considerable. In the end, could it be possible that we’ll lose even more money by closing the golf course? At least while it remained open to golfers, it brought in revenue.
At least voters will have some say in the fate of Nelson Park. Because of state and U.S. Department of Interior restrictions, the land cannot be sold without a referendum. I’m interested in possibilites for the site; I’d just like to be part of the decision process – like the rest of Decatur’s residents, whether or not we are elected officials, developers, or just lowly voters.
